Tuesday, November 12, 2013

KKK Halloween Costume -- Good for Wahlpurgisnacht, oh yeah!

From the NSP Newsroom:  And what's so bad about a KKK costume? Or about KKK garb, for that matter. Now, there's a group with the "right prejudices."  Get a warm feeling all over from the article excerpted below from the ultra-liberal, ultra-Jewish, and ultra ridiculous Huffington Post:

-- Thomas Folz, Associate Director of Communications, NSP.  1488!



Mom Lets Son Wear KKK Halloween Costume, Says It's A Family Tradition

The Huffington Post  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
spinner
A Virginia mother let her 7-year-old son wear a Ku Klux Klan costume this Halloween because, she insisted, it's a family tradition.
Jessica Black of Craigsville, Va., let her son, Jackson, dress as a Klansman with a floor-length white robe and full-faced white hood, according to local ABC affiliate WHSV. The outfit garnered media attention after a photo of the boy dressed in the KKK regalia was posted to the WHSV Facebook page. When Black was confronted by the news network, she defended her decision.
"My brother has [worn it] when he was in Kindergarten and when he was 13," Black said. She went on to claim there is nothing wrong with the costume or with the White Supremacist group, which she says still exists in their Virginia town. "It's supposed to be white with white, black with black, man with woman and all of that. That's what the KKK stands for."
(Story continues below.)
kkk costume
Jackson Black's costume. Screen grab courtesy of WHSV.

Facebook users were not happy about the attire.
"A mini kkk costume??? In our area??? Sounds like something we should ALL be concerned about. #noroomforacistsonthisplanet," one respondent wrote on the WHSV Facebook page. Another defended the child on the station's "Daybreak" Facebook page, saying he probably thought it was a ghost costume.
Some users were angry that the town was being criticized for the act of one individual, but others criticized these people for missing the larger point.
"The fact of the matter is that this event could have happened anywhere in the US and you all being more outraged that your town has a bad name than the actual issue at hand is extremely disappointing," wrote one woman. "A few of you have missed the point completely. Just because we are in a new century does not mean that racism is a thing of the past. Racism is alive and well and if you opened your eyes, you'd see it clearly."
It's been quite the Halloween season for offensive costumes. First there was actress Julianne's Hough's major mistake of going out in blackface to portray "Orange Is the New Black" character Crazy Eyes. Then, two men thought it would be funny to go out as Trayvon Martin (in blackface) and George Zimmerman. And the latest adult to face backlash on Twitter is the young woman who decided to dress up as a Boston bombing victim.
So much for setting a good example for our kids

Monday, November 11, 2013

Ulrichsberg Meeting of Third Reich Veterans Still Strong at 50th Anniversary!

From the NSP News Service:  The article below just goes to show that National Socialism is far from either dead or dormant, and the National Socialist Party sends congratulations to all Third Reich veterans and supporters, especially those who were able to attend the Ulrichsberg Conferences. The commander of the NSP, Dr. Jacques Pluss, himself attended the Ulrichsberg ceremonies when the group was much larger (in 1973), accompanied by his Swiss-Slovenian fascist grandmother, Mira Vrtovec Pluss, who passed away later that year, but not before hosting a gala dinner for former Waffen-SS hero, Joachim "Jacques" Peiper, who was also to die tragically just a short time later.  1488!

-- Karl Wolff III, Associate Director, NSP. 1488!

Nazi Waffen SS veterans honored in Austria
(AFP) – Sep 21, 2008 
ULRICHSBERG, Austria (AFP) — Hundreds of neo-Nazi sympathisers honoured Waffen SS veterans at the 50th edition of the controversial Ulrichsberg gathering in southern Austria Sunday.
Grouped on top of the Ulrichsberg mountain in the Carinthia province, a stronghold of the far-right nationalist leader Jorg Haider, about 500 people paid homage to the Third Reich soldiers' "sense of sacrifice."
Among the supporters were representatives from veterans' groups and from the Austrian army, as well as younger neo-Nazis and retired soldiers carrying the banners of the Flemish SS volunteers.
"We want to promote peace and remember that a war does not have any winners, only victims," said Rudolf Gallob, the president of the Ulrichsberg Association, during a religious ceremony.
"But we also want to remind people that we only did our duty" in fighting with the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS after the Anschluss between Austria and Nazi Germany in 1938.
Skinheads from several European countries applauded the proceedings, while women served out schnapps to stave off the cold weather.
Held since 1958 amid tight security, the gathering sparks controversy every year, not least because of its official status. Anti-fascist demonstrators staged a protest near the venue Sunday.
Haider triggered international outrage at the event in 1995 when he paid tribute to the Waffen SS, describing it as a group "of honest citizens who knew how to stay true to their convictions."
Valentin Sima, a historian at Klagenfurt University, told AFP that since then, the event's organisers had asked that the more provocative elements of the gathering -- such as the Kameradschaft IV (Comradeship 4) -- a veterans organisation of former Waffen SS members, be toned down.
Appearances by Gudrun Burwitz, the daughter of the former Waffen SS chief Heinrich Himmler, have also become more rare, she added.
Nevertheless, the memorial on top of the Ulrichsberg mountain still carries commemorative plaques dedicated to the Kameradschaft IV as well as to Spanish, Flemish, Norwegian, Croatian and Danish Waffen SS volonteers.
Those who received the Ritterkreuz (Knights cross) -- the second highest military order of the Third Reich -- are also honoured.
Such is the controversy still surrounding the Ulrichsberg gathering that Haider, facing legislative elections in a week, chose not to deliver a speech at Sunday's 50th commemoration.
Harry Cooper, head of the American Neo-Nazi Sharkhunters organisation, who sent a delegation of 20 members, said the event was unique of its kind because one could still pay tribute to soldiers who has been "honourably defeated."
Meanwhile, Wolfgang Zinggl, an Austrian Green deputy who acted as an observer at the gathering, told AFP that his party had lodged a complaint over the commemorative plaques and the fact that the army had attended the event.
"It is also inexcusable that during this ceremony, there was not one word about the victims of Nazism, or the crimes of the Wehrmacht (army)," he added.
The owner of the site, Peter von Goess, whose father Leopold fought in the SS, said the complaint was "without purpose."
"Everything is perfectly legal. And the turnout, which attracted thousands of people in the past, is dwindling each year as more and more veterans die," he told AFP.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Now The Orientals Compare Jimmy Kimmel (a Jew) to Hitler?




From the NSP News Service:  Stupid, just plain stupid! From a First Amendment protected statement to Oriental outrage, to comparisons with Hitler, this is just about the most ridiculous news item in a while! Why not make some comparisons to Moe Tse Tung, you idiots? Compared to him, living in a state run according to Adolf Hitler's principles would be like a "walk through the park." But poor education about Hitler -- Jewish inspired to be sure -- just fuels these cretin-like anti-Hitler confabulations.

-- Dr. Jacques A. Pluss, Commander, NSP.  1488!

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Netanyahu, Kerry, and Israeli Arrogance!

From the NSP News Service:  As a follow-up to the last post, just note the utter arrogance of Israel's Netanyahu. Of course, the international community must abide by rules, but the pseudo-state of Israel is completely exempt from them! Well, if they are exempt, they are also not a part of the international community -- and they should, therefore, be utterly disregarded.

-- Steven Clay, Assistant Director of Communications, NSP.  1488!

Kerry leaves for Geneva; Netanyahu talks tough on Iran                   

Benjamin Netanyahu
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks to reporters after his meeting with U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry at Ben Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv. (Debbie Hill / AFP/Getty Images / November 8, 2013)
JERUSALEM -- U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry's latest Mideast visit appeared to end in discord for Israel on the twin issues on the agenda, Israeli-Palestinian talks and Iran's nuclear program.

As Kerry left Israel for Geneva to help in negotiations with Iran, he made no concluding announcement on his series of meetings with Israeli and Palestinian leaders. According to Israeli media, Kerry canceled a planned joint statement to avoid clashing with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in public.

Kerry apparently said all he was going to say Friday in a private, two-hour meeting with Netanyahu at Ben-Gurion Airport that was added to the original schedule.

But heading into the meeting, Netanyahu talked tough as he delivered a statement reflecting displeasure at an emerging agreement between Iran and six world powers in Geneva, as well as differences with the U.S on Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

"I understand the Iranians are walking around very satisfied in Geneva, as well they should be," said Netanyahu, visibly angered. "Iran got the deal of the century and the international community got a bad deal," Netanyahu said. He added that Israel "is not obliged by this agreement" and that it will do "everything it needs to defend itself and defend the security of its people."

After the meeting, Netanyahu said he had urged Kerry "not to rush to sign, to wait, to reconsider and get a good deal."

Although Kerry departed with no statement on his efforts to revitalize Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, he made his positions clear in a television interview Thursday.

He warned Israelis against indifference and cautioned Israel that the price of failure could deliver violence at their doorstep and result in a third Palestinian uprising.

Kerry also took Israel's ongoing settlement-expansion efforts to task. "Let me ask you something ... if you say you're working for peace ... how can you say we're building in that place that will eventually be Palestine?" Kerry asked, and answered: "So it sends a message that somehow perhaps you're not really serious."

The format of the interview, given to a pair of Israeli and Palestinian journalists for broadcast on television outlets serving both groups, was no less of a statement.

Israeli officials reportedly did not appreciate parts of the interview, described by one media outlet as a "heavy slap in Netanyahu's face."  In a radio interview Friday, Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz said Kerry's tone "carried a concealed threat that Israel would be punished if we do not reach an agreement."

Netanyahu's comments Friday morning appeared to reflect the same feeling.

The same adamant stand on Israeli security regarding Iran is true for the negotiations with the Palestinians, the prime minister said, stressing he would resist "any international pressure."

Pressure on Israel was misplaced, Netanyahu said. "The pressure has to be put where it belongs, on the Palestinians who refuse to budge. ... No amount of pressure will make me or the government of Israel compromise on the basic security or national interests of Israel."

Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, head of Israel's peace negotiating team, took a different view. "Israel matters to Kerry, and he believes a peace agreement is critical to its security," Livni said.
Kerry had spoken "from his heart," she added.

From Israel, Kerry headed to Geneva to help narrow differences in the Iran negotiations at the request of European Union policy chief Catherine Ashton, according to a tweet from State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

Friday, November 8, 2013

Finally, Kerry Does Something that Makes Sense Regarding Iran!

From the NSP News Service:  The NSP firmly opposes the stance of Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu in regard to Iranian acquisition and possession of nuclear weapons or the material to make them. As usual, the Jewish element in the Middle East, and elsewhere, will not cooperate with the international community -- note Israel's position on the NPT -- but expects all sorts of concessions, breaks and deals. There goes the usual Jewish self-centered greed yet again.

-- Thomas Folz, Associate Director, NSP Communications.  1488!

[Please scroll down for article]


 

Israel fury as Kerry heads to Iran talks in Geneva

 
 
 
AFP
US Secretary of State John Kerry arrives at Geneva International airport on November 8, 2013 as Iran and six world powers are making progress in negotiations aimed at ending a decade-long stand-off over its nuclear ambitions
.
View gallery
  • .
  • .
  • .
Ben Gurion (Israel) (AFP) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned John Kerry on Friday he was offering Iran the "deal of the century" as the US top diplomat travelled to talks in Geneva seeking a nuclear accord.
Netanyahu vowed that Israel would not be bound by any international agreement on Iran's nuclear programme and reserved the right to do whatever is necessary to defend itself -- a clear allusion to a pre-emptive military strike.
Iran slammed Netanyahu's "fear mongering", saying that the Jewish state, the region's sole if undeclared nuclear power, was "the major source of ... instability" and had no legal credibility.
Meeting with the US Secretary of State on the tarmac of Ben Gurion airport near Tel Aviv, the Israeli leader, a fierce opponent of any let-up in sanctions, lashed out at the world powers' cautious rapprochement with Iran and denounced the proposed agreement being hammered out in Switzerland.
Kerry flew in from Amman for a brief stopover in Tel Aviv where he held a two-hour meeting with Netanyahu in a bid to soothe Israeli anger ahead of his arrival in Geneva for a landmark three-way meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton.
"Iran got the deal of the century and the international community got a bad deal, this is a very bad deal. Israel utterly rejects it," Netanyahu told reporters of the proposals under discussion.
"Israel is not obliged by this agreement and Israel will do everything it needs to defend itself and the security of its people."
Israel views a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat and has consistently refused to rule out a pre-emptive military strike to prevent that from happening.
"I reminded him (Kerry) that he said that no deal is better than a bad deal. And the deal that is being discussed in Geneva right now is a bad deal," Netanyahu said after their meeting.
"Iran is not required to take apart even one (uranium enrichment) centrifuge. But the international community is relieving sanctions on Iran for the first time after many years.
"I urge Secretary Kerry not to rush to sign, to wait, to reconsider, to get a good deal," Netanyahu said.
From Geneva, Zarif hit back at Netanyahu, saying Israel did not "have any credibility, not in fact, nor in law.
"It (Israel) is the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the region, the only non-member of the NPT (nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty), the only possessor of chemical weapons," Zarif told Swiss television channel RTS.
"So it doesn't have the legal credibility to accuse a country that is a long-standing member of the NPT, whose installations are under daily monitoring."
Kerry trip to 'help narrow differences'
Washington, meanwhile, made clear that Kerry's arrival in Geneva did not signal that there is a done deal with Iran. "In an effort to help narrow the differences in negotiations, Secretary Kerry will travel to Geneva," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said.
Western governments -- and Israel -- suspect Iran of seeking to develop a nuclear weapons capability under cover of its civilian programme.
Tehran denies any such ambition and, since President Hassan Rouhani took office in August, has made overtures suggesting it is prepared to scale back its enrichment of uranium in return for the easing of crippling Western sanctions.
Washington, which has not had diplomatic relations with Iran for three decades, has repeatedly said it is going into the talks with eyes wide open, seeking to explore the diplomatic possibilities of bringing its suspect nuclear programme under international control.
A senior State Department official said that since the first round of talks with the Rouhani administration last month, Kerry has been open to the possibility of travelling to Geneva for this current round if it would "help narrow differences."
Iran is anxious for relief from crippling Western economic sanctions that have cut oil revenues by more than half, caused the value of the rial to plunge and pushed inflation above 40 percent.
The West is keen to seize a rare opportunity to build bridges with Iran after decades of hostility, opening the door to engaging with Tehran on other issues like the conflict in Syria, where Iran has backed President Bashar al-Assad against insurgents.
View Comments